Trying elastic net regularisation with correlated predictors

First simulate data where \(x_1\) to \(x_3\) are identical and \(x_4\) is uncorrelated with them. Each \(x\) is a z-score.

Set \(y = 0.2 (x_1 + x_2 + x_3) + 0.3 x_4 + \epsilon\).

Now try elastic nets, varying \(\alpha\) from 0 (ridge regression) to 1 (lasso). I used 10‑fold cross‑validation to select \(\lambda\), keeping the coefficients for the smallest \(\lambda\), and used the same fold assignments across all values of \(\alpha\).

Here’s a picture of the coefficients. Note how the correlated predictor slopes separate as \(\alpha\) increases until only one survives with a slope of about three times 0.2 (to compensate for the other missing identical predictors). The uncorrelated predictor slope stays the same.

Here’s a table of coefficients for a selection of \(\alpha\), including the results from an unpenalised regression with only \(x_1\) and \(x_4\) as predictors:

Variableα = 0α = 0.9α = 1Unpenalised
regression
(Intercept)0.0020.0020.0020.002
x10.1980.2430.6000.603
x20.1960.188
x30.1950.169
x40.2710.2870.2870.290

Testing 1 2 3 (4 5 6 7 8 …)

When should you adjust p‑values or confidence intervals for multiple testing? It’s a complicated (and often painful) question, with the wide continuum of possible answers depicted below by Susan Ahmed (1991):

I haven’t met anyone who’s an ultra conservative (on this dimension), but it may be an interesting exercise to estimate how many statistical tests you’re likely to use in a lifetime and what, e.g., a lifetime Bonferroni penality would do to your career.

Sabine Hoffmann and colleagues (2026) offer a helpful guide on what to do. They summarise their principle as follows: “multiple testing should be adjusted for if and only if authors, when reporting and interpreting their findings, put more emphasis on the results of one or several of the tests because of their small p‑value(s)” (p. 3).

This criterion of emphasis applies throughout your reporting, from the title and abstract through to the depths of the results section and discussion. They illustrate this using the example of a study that tested the impact of seven vitamins on mortality (p. 8).

Suppose you find two statistically significant findings out of seven.

If your title were “Vitamin D and vitamin B12 are independent risk factors for all‑cause mortality”, then you need to adjust.

If your title were “Two out of seven vitamins are independent risk factors for all‑cause mortality”, then you don’t.

References

Ahmed, S. W. (1991). Issues arising in the application of Bonferroni procedures in federal surveys. ASA Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, 344–349.

Hoffmann, S., Lemster, S., Collins, G., Hapfelmeier, A., Heinze, G., Mayr, A., Schmid, M., Wilcke, J. C., & Boulesteix, A. (2026). When to Adjust for Multiple Testing: A Unifying Guiding Principle. Biometrical Journal, 68(4), e70148.

Deaths in immigration detention

The latest statistics are available up to end of 2024 here (tab Det_05b has a breakdown by centre):

YearNumberSexAgeNationalityCause of deathPlace of incidentPlace of death
20171Male18 to 29PolandSelf-inflictedMorton Hall IRCIn detention
20171Male30 to 49PolandOtherThe Verne IRCIn the community
20171Male30 to 49SloveniaSelf-inflictedThe Verne IRCIn detention
20171Male18 to 29PolandSelf-inflictedHarmondsworth IRCIn the community
20171Male50 to 69ChinaNatural causesDungavel IRCIn detention
20171Male30 to 49JamaicaNatural causesMorton Hall IRCIn the community
20171Male18 to 29IraqSelf-inflictedMorton Hall IRCIn detention
20181Male50 to 69AlgeriaNatural causesHarmondsworth IRCIn detention
20191Male30 to 49NigeriaOtherHarmondsworth IRCIn detention
20200
20211Male30 to 49CzechiaSelf-inflictedMorton Hall IRCIn detention
20211Male30 to 49RomaniaNatural causesDungavel IRCIn the community
20221Male30 to 49IraqiNatural causesManston STHFIn the community
20231Male30 to 49ColumbiaSelf-inflictedColnbrook IRCIn detention
20231Male30 to 49AlbaniaSelf-inflictedBrook House IRCIn the community
20241Male18 to 29FranceNatural causesBrook House IRCIn detention

The stats for 2025 are due to be published 27 August 2026. Release dates are in the Research and statistics calendar.